|
|
| Knowledge Base |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Resolving the HIPC problem: is good policy enough?
HIPC: the need for political and social reforms to provide new frameworks to govern social competition
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Overview
|
|
|
|
Read This Document
|
|
|
|
Meet The Authors
|
|
|
|
Papers by Same Organization
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Recent analysis of the HIPC problem argues that the short time horizons (high discount rates) of governments lead to bad policy and economic decline. This paper argues that this is an incomplete explanation of the HIPC problem. Instead, the paper argues that the root cause is institutional decline, resulting in competition between social groups (often along ethnic and regional dimensions) that is increasingly unregulated by rules of the game-the formal rules being weak (or ignored) and the informal rules having buckled under economic and environmental stress. This has two effects on external debt. The first is to reduce time horizons leading to bad policy such as real exchange rate overvaluation that discourage tradables production (the effect highlighted in recent analysis). But second, unregulated social competition reduces the time horizons of communities and the larger private sector by raising investor uncertainty. These producers move out of sectors with long-term returns (tropical cash crops etc.) and switch to activities with more immediate returns (subsistence agriculture and commerce). The former are largely tradables, the latter are non-tradables. The tradables base of the economy, and its capacity to service foreign debt, is therefore squeezed from two directions-bad policy and investor uncertainty-both rooted in unregulated social competition. The paper then investigates which of these effects is more important in explaining the probability of becoming a HIPC. The first effect, bad policy, is found to be less important than the second effect, investor uncertainty, in explaining why countries become HIPCs. Therefore efforts to improve policy are not enough; fundamental political and social reforms, including democratisation, are needed to provide new institutional frameworks to govern social competition. This will lengthen the time horizons of governments, communities and the private sector, and increase the investment necessary to achieve growth and to avoid debt crisis. [From the author] Provided by Eldis, a GDNet content partner |
Download Full Text
This URL might direct you to other sources that GDN is not responsible for |
|
|
|
|
Finland
Senior Reseach Fellow, World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU/WIDER)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Debt relief and ODA: most important not in isolation, but as help for self-help |
| By Abrego, L.|Ross, D. C., 2001 |
| Produced by: WIDER Development Conference on Debt Relief |
|
|
| Themes: Development Finance & Aid Effectiveness, Environment and Climate Change, International Affairs, Labor & Social Protections, Macroeconomics and Economic Growth, Poverty & Inequality, Private Sector Development, Urban Development and the Global South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Will the HIPC Initiative prove to have been more or less influential than its almost accidental by-product, the PRSP? |
| By Booth, D., 2001 |
| Produced by: WIDER Development Conference on Debt Relief |
|
|
| Themes: Domestic Resource Mobilization, Poverty & Inequality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Uganda, debt and the HIPC initiative |
| By Muwanga-Zake, E.S.K. and Ndhaye, S., 2001 |
| Produced by: WIDER Development Conference on Debt Relief |
|
| Countries: Uganda |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
